| Bangkok PunditBPLocation: Bangkok, Thailand
|
Photos from Bangkok, May 19: An update | + enlarge | |
| Dec. 09 2010 - 03:48 pm View comments (1) | ||
| 13 | |||
The other day BP blogged about some photos that have been released online purportedly from the day of the May 19 crackdown. There were many questions about the photos. The Bangkok Post has a story here after red shirt leader Jatuporn has been referring to the photos and passing them onto the press. It appears the photos may have been leaked from a DSI file about them per the Bangkok Post:
The Department of Special Investigation has conceded that some documents released to the public by the Puea Thai Party concerning the deaths of red shirt protesters are in its files.
But it declined to verify whether all the information released by Puea Thai Party list MP Jatuporn Prompan was accurate.
Mr Jatuporn, a co-leader of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship, distributed to the media on Tuesday reports and photographs of protesters and other individuals killed during the political violence in April and May. He claimed the photographs were new and showed military officers had a hand in the killing of protesters at Wat Pathum Wanaram near Ratchaprasong intersection.
Mr Jatuporn claimed he had received copies of 10 DSI investigation reports from police officers who are red shirt supporters. He distributed four reports among the media.
BP: Are the photos included in what DSI is saying? It is unclear. Someone who wishes to remain anonymous and has spent a lot of time looking at the photos has passed on the following:
If you have a problem viewing the below, go here.
---
Contradicting claims are already being made about what these photos portray, including in the captions to the photos themselves on Facebook and the comments from other Facebook users. The photos have now been copied to other web boards, further splintering the discussion. With so many questions surrounding those days, it's easy to leap to conclusions.
This article is an attempt to establish what facts we can and cannot glean from the photographs. It is based on many hours of examining the photographs, area maps and CTW floor plans (all publicly available), in addition to several hours of scouting done at and around CTW to identify and verify the locations seen in these photos.
I decided to write this detailed analysis because I believe that if I don't do it, with the current political climate and constraints on the press it's unlikely anyone will.
The key questions surrounding these photos are:
- Were the photos taken at CentralWorld?
- Were the photos all taken by the same person?
- Who was the photographer?
- Were the photos all taken the same day?
- Were the photos taken before or after the fire at CentralWorld?
- Who was in control of CentralWorld before the fire?
After careful examination, I believe we can confidently answer all of these questions except the last one.
Were the photos taken at CentralWorld? We can say with certainty that most of the pictures were taken at and outside of CTW. Mall signs are clearly visible in certain photos, and anyone interested in doing so can verify the locations just as I have. The exceptions are photos 36-49, and 52-60, which are more difficult to pinpoint, but were taken in the general vicinity. At least some were taken outside Siam Paragon, and some outside of Siam Center, on the Siam Tower side.
Were the photos all taken the same day? The images were not all taken the same day. They can be divided into two main sets: Photos 1-60, which were taken on the afternoon of May 19th, and photos 61-73, which were taken on May 21st. [Update: An additional photo, which I will call Photo 74, was added yesterday to the Facebook album containing the first 73. It is a low resolution photo that appears to have come from a different camera, but it serves to clarify an important point, as discussed below.]
Were the photos taken before or after the fire at CentralWorld? The first set of photos were taken before the fire broke out in CTW (though towards the end of this set, in Photos 50-51, the smoke can be seen beginning to rise), and the second set of set were taken after the fire was extinguished.
Who was in control of CentralWorld before the fire? We simply cannot say. The photos do not really answer this question at all, though they do indicate there were armed persons inside the mall. We see photographic evidence that security guards were shot on Level 3, and that the shooters aimed primarily for the legs. Based on those photographs we can speculate that shooters were firing from the direction of Zone A, which is now closed down due to fire damage, and which suffered a partial collapse. We also see less clear evidence that a man, possible a protester or a looter, was shot in the leg on Level 1.
We can conclude that there was at least one shooter or group of shooters inside CTW, but to conclude anything more would be to go beyond what the current evidence shows. The people with guns inside CTW could have been one of a number of groups, with the two most obvious possibilities being the Thai military and the so-called Men In Black, an armed militia group believed to be associated with the Red Shirts.
We can also conclude that there were likely armed men in the area behind Siam Paragon, but again there is no clear evidence who these shooters were, and certainly no evidence that they are connected with whoever was shooting inside CTW. It's possible they are military, but the only armed soldiers pictured in this photo set are relaxed and resting against a wall.
Before getting into the detailed analysis, here is a reference map of CentralWorld and vicinity:
This map is rotated 180 degrees so that it lines up visually with the CTW floor plans included at the end of this article. (The floor plans pinpoint which photos were taken at which locations within CTW, insofar as I have been able to ascertain.)
The main mall portion of CentralWorld is divided into Zones A-F. This is important for getting a sense of where events within the mall took place. Not every level has every zone, however, depending on the particular layout of that level.
The protesters
Recreation of Photo 1:
After some scouting, I was able to determine that the photographer was located beside Cafe de Bliss in Zone E of Level 3, looking down two stories onto the men, who were entering CTW from the south entrance which faces Rama I Road. The black iron railing seen here is unique to Cafe de Bliss, so the position of this photo is certain. The red upholstered furniture visible in the photo has since been replaced with wicker (perhaps because the upholstered furniture would have reeked of smoke after the fire).
The giant Christmas tree is blocking most of this view, and the recreation was taken from Level 2, while the original was shot from Level 3, but the Marie France Bodyline advertisement on the escalator is the same as from May, as well as the partially visible Samsung advertising on the elevator.
Someone with medical expertise could comment more authoritatively, but it looks rather like he has been grazed by a bullet. Given that he's in the middle of an open space, this injury must have been caused by a projectile of some kind. It's unclear what kind of object fired from a slingshot could cause a wound like this. Also, this looks decidedly different from wounds caused by lead shot seen in later photos. If it is a bullet wound, you can actually see the path the bullet took as it grazed him. This must have been immediately after he was hit, before the wound had a chance to start bleeding much, because the next photos appear to show his leg with more blood on it:
Photo 12: Men with walkie talkies and red lanyards.
Photo 14: Men with walkie talkies and red lanyards.
In Photo 15, the man on the far left can also be seen to have a red walkie talkie on his back belt. The man in the black undershirt has an ID badge on a red lanyard tucked into his front right pocket. The man in the white undershirt has a red walkie talkie on his back belt and a red lanyard around his neck.
Photo 15: Men with walkie talkies and red lanyards.
Security uniforms: Photo 17 shows a man wearing dark pants with a gold double stripe. This is specific to the uniform of the CTW parking lot security guards. At CTW the parking area is full of attendants in these same pants, with white shirt and gold epaulets. The gold epaulets can be seen, barely, in Photo 15, perhaps the same man as in Photo 17. (Note: Many men in similar guard uniforms can be also be seen in photos 29-60.)
For all of these reasons, we must conclude that the men on Level 3, unlike the men on Level 1, are employees of the mall. And the photographer, being with them, is also probably mall security.
The Facebook captions claim the men were shot with shotguns. The photos appear to corroborate this. Multiple small wounds can be seen on the legs of the security guard in Photos 26 and 27, similar to the type of wound we would expect lead shot from a shotgun to make.
Recreation of Photo 32:
The people in the photo are facing CentralWorld, hiding behind a van, but looking back in the direction of the Siam Paragon parking structure.
Photo 35: Facing east towards the entrance to Centara Grand, on the northwest corner of the CTW complex.
Recreation of Photo 35:
The old trees visible in Photo 35 along this sidewalk have since been cut down and replaced with new palm trees, but otherwise the view is the same. This photo was taken immediately across the road from Wat Pathumwanaram School.
The people in Photos 29-35 are all hiding behind nearby vehicles. They are hiding on the CTW side, supporting the idea that the shooters are firing from the direction of Siam Paragon. And in Photos 31-32, the group of people is clearly walking towards the CTW complex, while looking nervously back towards the direction of Siam Paragon. Many of the people hiding in these photos are wearing security guard uniforms, and in Photo 30 a woman and child can be seen among the people hiding.
Even though the photos appear to show that there were shooters firing from the direction of Siam Paragon, we lack clear evidence as to who the shooters are and why they are shooting. Did Siam Paragon have armed guards? Circumstantially the military is one obvious candidate, because they are seen in these photos holding guns, and of course were heavily armed throughout the protests. In Photo 36 the solder in the middle is holding a shotgun and two others are holding automatic rifles. However, they are relaxing against the fence, not on alert and definitely not firing their weapons. The soldiers with riot shields in Photo 37 do not even appear to be armed.
I was not able to find the precise locations of Photos 36-37, but I was able to rule out the area where the shooters from Photos 29-35 were likely standing. Nowhere in that vicinity matches the locations where these soldiers are seen. So if it was soldiers firing weapons outside of Siam Paragon, it was not these ones. And regardless of who the Siam Paragon shooters were, these photos provide no evidence that they are connected in any way with the shooters inside the mall.
Photo 38 shows a stream of people walking in an orderly fashion along the west side of Siam Paragon (see area map below). I have not confirmed exactly where these photos were taken, but we can see a beige wall with green shrubbery and Citi M Visa advertising banners on the right sight of Photo 38. In Photo 39 we can see the far end of the same beige wall, complete with shrub and Citi M Visa banner, only now people are prostrate on the ground, apparently hiding from gunfire. For example, the man seen standing in an orange jumpsuit in the distance of Photo 38 is lying flat in Photo 39.
In Photo 40 we can also see the beige wall and shrubbery, as well as a sign advertising "FREE SHUTTLE SERVICE / SIAM PARAGON TO SIAM TOWER / SIAM PARAGON TO PETBURI SOI [unclear, but looks like 18]". And in Photo 53, which depicts the same location and appears to be out of order, we can see a sign with the Siam Paragon logo. So we can tell that our photographer moved from the CTW area to the west side of Siam Paragon.
When we zoom in and lighten the photograph, we can see he is standing next to a Green Music store
It almost looks like he's snoozing! But he could also just be looking down at something he's holding. It's certainly a possibility that the BTS Siam was the source of the gunfire that people are seen hiding from in photos 39-40. Does the fact that the photographer snapped this photo indicate this is the shooter? Or did he simply see the man there and decide to snap this shot? While this evidence is tantalizing, it's far from conclusive.
Photos 42-49 show people hiding out in a parking lot. I did not pinpoint exactly which parking lot these people are in, but it appears to me to be the Siam Center parking structure. It is worth noting that the injured man who was shot in the foot on Level 3 of CTW (seen being carried in Photos 15-16) is the same man being treated for injures by security guards in the parking structure location in Photos 42-44:
Photos 54-60 show that after hiding out in a parking lot, a large number of people are evacuated towards Phayathai Road. We know the direction of their movement from details in these photos. In Photo 54 the stream of people and security guards are walking past the Siam Center parking structure, on their left, and the back entrance to Siam Center, on their right. In Photo 55 they are walking between Siam Center and Siam Tower. Comparing the angle of the buildings against an aerial map, it's clear they are walking towards Phayathai Road, which can be seen in Photo 60.
This area map of shows where several photos from this sequence from were taken:
Photo 50:
It's possible that the photographer heard a fire had started and ran back toward CTW to take photographs, but it's not clear that it fits into the sequence of events. He--and others seen in these photos--would have had to backtrack past Siam Paragon, and we have already established there was gunfire from multiple points around Siam Paragon mall. The people in Photo 51 are standing around casually, with no evident fear of the gunmen in the area.
For this reason, I believe the most likely scenario is that the photos are out of sequence, and that they were taken before gunmen started firing in Photos 29-35. Once the gunfire commence the people standing around watching the smoke scattered to either side of the road, as we can see happened in those photos. If this is true, then Photos 29-60 all took place after the fire had started.
I do not know exactly when the smoke was first seen coming from CTW. According to the Wolfram Alpha website, sunset on May 19th occurred in Bangkok at 6:39 pm. This tweet from that evening, for example, shows that by 5pm the fire was already raging. And the daylight in Photos 50-51 appears to show that the fire started in the late afternoon. The sun is already far enough west that the bystanders are in the shadow of Siam Paragon.
Further searching of Twitter and media reports could probably pinpoint when the smoke was first spotted, but assuming the time given in the caption of Photo 1 (2:26 PM), a total time of perhaps two hours has passed between when Photo 1 and Photo 50 were taken.
Photos from May 21st
After careful examination, we can conclude that these photos portray a combination of military personnel, police, and mall employees surveying aftermath of the CTW fire.
Photo 61. Level 1, Zone C. Tissot watch store, facing south towards Zone E:
Photo 61 is quite dark, so a lightened version reveals significantly more detail:
In the zoomed portion of Photo 61 we can see what appears to be a black cloth partially covering the glass display case, and the man is bending down towards the black lump on the floor. This black lump might simply be the rest of the cloth that has slid off the glass display cases, and the man is bending down to pick it up. In any case, this is simply not good evidence for anything out of the ordinary.
Photo 62. Level 2, Zone B. Watsons drug store:
The McDonald's which was located to the right of this Watsons has since moved, and the windows are now papered over.
Photo 63 is dark, so it's not clear, but the area just past Topman in the photo is Zone A, the zone immediately adjacent to the portion of CTW that collapsed during the fire. As can be seen in the recreation, this whole Zone has been closed off. In addition, all throughout the mall the ceilings have been been redone, as seen here, as well as all the direction signs that hang down from the ceilings.
The victim of the CTW fire
Photos 66-73 are GRAPHIC. These record the discovery of the sole confirmed victim of the CTW fire.
Photo 66 is perhaps the most affecting of the lot, even if the ones after it are more gruesome. It shows the victim as the authorities found him, huddled on the ground, legs spread, face buried in his green shirt. A fire extinguisher and numerous empty bottles of water are at his feet. The cement floor is still visibly wet. It paints a saddening picture of a man trapped, struggling to fend off the scalding smoke from the CTW fire.
ได้ รับแจ้งจากเจ้าหน้าที่ทหารที่มาลาดตระเวร [obstructed by ID card] ได้เข้ามาทำการเคลียร์พื้นที่ภายในห้างอิเซตัน ส่วนด้านขวาของ[เซ็น]ทรัลเวอร์ พบศพชายไม่ทราบชื่อ นอนเสียชีวิตอยู่ จึงได้แจ้งให้เจ้าหน้าที่ตำรวจทราบ
"Notice was received from soldiers on patrol [...] that they had come to clear the area of Isetan mall on the right side of CentralWorld. They discovered the body of an unidentified male lying on the floor, and thus notified the police."
Note that initial statements made to the media by police claimed that the victim's identity was unknown and that he was estimated to be 25-30 years old. But these media reports do confirm that it was the 21st when Kitiphong's body was discovered.
Based on his casual clothing, and the fact that he was in an electronics store that had had its window smashed, we can conclude that the victim of the CTW fire was a would-be looter. He doesn't have much to show for it, however. Photo 71 shows the effects found on his person: 3244 baht (about US$100), an ATM card, a photo of the king, and a few other odds and ends.
Where was the victim? The news reported linked just now quotes the police as saying he was discovered on Level 4 of CTW. Using these images, we are able to confirm this claim and further pinpoint the location. The photos appear to show that the victim died inside a back room of the Sony Ericsson store, apparently from asphyxiation due to smoke inhalation.
Photo 64 shows army and police personnel outside of the Samsung Mobile store, where one of the windows of the Samsung store is shattered. Note the heavy smoke residue on the floor:
Update: Another photo [the below photo] has since been added to the Facebook album, which I am calling Photo 74. This photo clearly identifies the location of Photo 65 as inside the Sony Ericsson store. We can see the same white oval shape on the back wall, and even the small white sheet of paper hanging on the wall to the left of it. Photo 74 also shows that, like the Samsung store, the Sony Ericsson store had its window shattered:
Photos 67-70 show the victim's body after medics have laid him out flat on an orange stretcher emblazoned with the emblem of theRuamkatanyu Foundation, one of Thailand's two main emergency and rescue organizations.
How did the victim die? In the photographs, this area of CTW only shows signs of smoke damage. Zone C is a large, open cylinder that stretches up to the full height of the main mall. Though it is approximately 100 meters from the area of the mall that is known to have collapsed from fire, the smoke from the fire would likely have filled the hallways of the mall's upper floors and spilled out into this large open space.
In Photo 66 we can see that the victim's hands are still clutching his green shirt, holding it tightly against his face. Perhaps once smoke from the Zen fire started billowing in, he fled into the back room thinking he could escape the smoke. His attempts to fight the smoke having failed, he drops to the floor and covers his face with his shirt.
Some commenters on Facebook have claimed this photo shows the victim was shot, apparently because some blood can be seen in the water on the floor around his head. This is fanciful thinking. The skin on his face is bloated and oozing, and the skin on his chest has started to peel off, for whatever reason. This is the apparent source of the trickle of blood on the floor. Being neither a physician nor a forensic scientist I can't comment further on the precise condition of his body, but as he died in the position he did, asphyxiation seems like the most likely cause of death.
Finally, Photo 73 shows the victim's body after it has been moved to the stretcher in front of the escalators on Level 4 of Zone C at CTW. This section from the floorplan of CTW shows where things are positioned:
If you go to CTW today, you will see that the two stores are now boarded off:
As it turns out, the truth about the victim of the CTW fire was floating around on Twitter on May 21st, lost in the sea of rumors and misinformation. This tweet from @js100radio describes the situation exactly correctly (except for the misspelled name). We simply lacked the evidence to confirm it until now.
Level 1 (Photos 1-11, 61):
Level 2 (Photos 62, 63):
Level 3 (Photos 12-14):
Level 4 (Photos 64-74):
The photographs also show at least three different sources of apparent gunfire: (1) unseen shooter(s) inside CTW, who fired upon security guards and possibly fired at a protester; (2) unseen shooter(s) located near the northeast corner of Siam Paragon; and (3) unseen shooter(s) on the west side of Siam Paragon, possibly connected to the camouflaged man in the ski mask photographed on the Siam BTS platform.
As discussed above, the photographer was almost certainly a security guard for CTW. This raises an important question: Have the security guards from inside the mall been questioned as to what they saw at CTW before the fire? Many faces can be clearly seen. No doubt they saw more than was photographed here. Will any journalists step up and track down these witnesses?
Col. Sansern Kaewkamnerd made a response to these photographs on behalf of CRES this past Tuesday, December 7th. (See the Matichon report.) He dismissed the photographs, saying they contain nothing new.
The government's dismissal of this new evidence out of hand, and their refusal to acknowledge and respond to a public clearly hungry for more information, simply demonstrates their ongoing dedication to a policy of strict opacity, and a lack of responsibility towards informing the public they are supposed to serve.
No comments:
Post a Comment